years in China, this is notoriously not the case,
the is of the limitation disappeare, and the
state concerned cannot complain if the warships
of foreign states do not allow their attempts
at protecting the soa-borne commerce of the
world in those waters from being frustrated by
the pirates being enabled to use the waters
and territory of the state concerned as a secure
asylum. @hould the state monoerned make a
protest in such circumstances, it would expose
Itself to the reproach of making its sovereign
ights into a protection for acts of piracy, com-
itted not only in its own watera but also on the
igh seas,
18. But apart from this general considera.
ion, which is in itself decisive, there can
bviously be ao objection to a warship taking
stion against pirates in the territorial
aters of another elute lí that above hap
nvited he to do so, and the fuots show
lat such is the case bere.
Jo far as the
›levant treaty provisions are concerned there
I nothing in the wording of Article 53 of the
Treaty
22
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.